← Back to Species List

Andrena bucculenta

Authority: LaBerge and Ribble

Assessment

Date: 1/27/2025

Justification:
Andrena bucculenta is a solitary bee that occurs in California, United States, west of the Sierra Nevada Mountains from near the Oregon border south to the Los Angeles area. Using all known records of the species, the extent of occurrence is 151,026 km2, however the species has not been observed since 1997. SEARCH EFFORT SENTENCE. Across the range of the species, impacts from climate change and drought, habitat loss and degradation due to urbanization and agricultural intensification, and exposure to pesticides have been observed. The species also occurs in a habitat type that is threatened by exceptionally high development pressure, fragmentation, and alteration of the fire regime. These factors may be acting on the species at local levels. More information is needed to assess if this species is extant across its range, and if so, to determine its habitat needs, threats, and population size. RANK SENTENCE.

Distribution

Country Occurrence:
United States: California
EOO:151026.00 km²
AOO:92.00 km²
Elevation:2 - 1404 m
Map Notes:The map was created by generating a polygon around all known observations of the species and generalizing it.

Population

Trend:Unknown
Generation Length:1.00 years

Habitats and Ecology

The dietary breadth of this species is not well understood. It has been collected from Salix (Salicaceae), Eschscholzia california (Papaveraceae), and Layia platyglossa (Asteraceae) (LaBerge and Ribble 1972). It has been recorded from grassland, shrubland, evergreen forest, and agricultural and urban areas. This species likely nests underground like all other Andrena (Danforth et al. 2019), but nests from this species have not been described. Nest cells from other members of this genus are located at the ends of the lateral burrows, which are typically lined with a waxy Dufour’s gland secretion (Cane 1981) that serves to both isolate the provision from pathogens in the surrounding soil and to regulate water uptake from the soil atmosphere (Cane and Love 2021). Females provision each cell with a ball of pollen moistened with nectar on which they lay a single egg (Michener 2007). Records of this species come from March through July, with most records from March(Chesshire et al. 2023). Adults are assumed to emerge annually (Danforth et al. 2019).

Habitat Types

Use and Trade

This species is not known to be utilized commercially.

Threats

Since 2000, the Southwest U.S. has seen the worst drought in 1200 years (Williams, Cook, and Smerdon 2022). Drought can reduce the abundance of flowering plants on a landscape scale, and also reduce pollen and nectar quality (Wilson Rankin, Barney, and Lozano 2020). Drought conditions have been shown to reduce the diversity and abundance of native bees (Minckley, Roulston, and Williams 2013; Hung et al. 2021). This species occurs in California coastal sage scrub habitat, one of California's most threatened vegetation types, which is globally imperiled (NatureServe 2024). This habitat is highly threatened by modification, fragmentation, and loss due to urban and suburban growth. Nearly half of California’s residents live in the coastal California counties where this habitat occurs, which is less than 10% of the state’s land area (Riordan and Rundel 2013). Less than 20% of this habitat remains (Davis, Stine, and Stoms 1994), and the existing fragments are considered some of most valuable real estate in California. This contributes to considerable development pressure on remaining fragments, and their high real estate value makes their conservation costly. Coastal sage scrub has also been modified significantly in the past 100 years due to exotic annual grass invasion, which has been facilitated by increased wildfire frequency (Minnich and Dezzani 1998; Talluto and Suding 2008). These factors also contribute to a feedback where increased grass cover increases fire frequency, leading to grassland conversion. This habitat conversion may limit the availability of host plants used by Andrena buccalenta and alter other abiotic factors important for this species. Certain aspects of this species' biology may make it more vulnerable to some threats. Andrena buccalenta is a ground nesting species, and nests may be harmed by certain agricultural practices such as tilling, which can kill bees nesting close to the surface (Williams et al. 2010). Additionally, Andrena have been reported to have low reproductive output because of the short adult life span, and a low rate of brood cell provisioning (reviewed in Danforth et al. 2019). Other threats to bees generally include habitat loss or modification, climate change, pesticide use, exposure to pathogens from managed bee species, and competition with honey bees (Brown and Paxton 2009; Potts et al. 2010; Wojcik et al. 2018; Grab et al. 2019; Raven and Wagner 2021).
Code Threat Timing Scope Severity
1 Residential & commercial development - 1.2. Commercial & industrial areas Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, significant declines
1.1 Residential & commercial development - Housing & urban areas Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, significant declines
1.2 Residential & commercial development - Commercial & industrial areas Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, significant declines
2 Agriculture and aquaculture - Livestock farming and ranching -> Agro-industry grazing, ranching, or farming Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
2.1.3 Agriculture & aquaculture - Agro-industry farming Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
7 Natural system modifications - 7.1. Fire & fire suppression -> 7.1.2. Suppression in fire frequency/intensity Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
7.1.1 Natural system modifications - Increase in fire frequency/intensity Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
7.1.2 Natural system modifications - Suppression in fire frequency/intensity Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
8 Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - 8.1 Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
8.1.2 Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - Named species Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
9 Pollution - 9.3 Agricultural and forestry effluents -> 9.3.3 Herbicides and Pesticides Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
9.3.3 Pollution - Herbicides and Pesticides Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
11 Climate change & severe weather - 11.3.Temperature extremes Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
11.1 Climate change & severe weather - Habitat shifting & alteration Ongoing Majority (50-90%) Slow, significant declines
11.2 Climate change & severe weather - Droughts Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines
11.3 Climate change & severe weather - Temperature extremes Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, significant declines

Conservation Actions

Conservation needs No known conservation actions are in place for this species. Observations of this species are known from National Forest Service land and state park lands, but this does not confer any specific protections to the species. Further research is needed to determine the overall size of the population and to identify trends and existing threats. Specific conservation needs for this species have not been identified. Due to the importance of supporting wild bee populations for pollination services, general conservation practices are recommended including, restoring, creating, and preserving natural high-quality habitats to include suitable forage and nesting sites; limiting pesticide use on or near suitable habitat, particularly during the adult bee’s flight period; promoting farming and urban practices that increase pollinator-friendly plants in margin space; minimizing exposure of wild bees to diseases transferred from managed bees; and lastly, avoiding honey bee introduction to high-quality native bee habitat.

Actions Needed

Research Needs

Surveys targeting this species are needed throughout its range to determine its persistence throughout its historic range. More information is needed about the population status, range limits, habitat, and ecology of this species.

Taxonomic Notes

(a. any taxonomic concerns about the validity of the species? b. any taxonomic revisions underway that would require a species reassessment.