← Back to Species List
Andrena utahensis
Common Name: Mining Bee
Authority: LaBerge
Traits
Solitary
Tongue: Short
Nesting Substrates
Ground
[source]
Floral Hosts
| Family |
Genus |
Species |
Foraging |
Source |
| Asteraceae |
Coreopsis |
- |
Mesolectic |
link |
| Asteraceae |
Enceliopsis |
- |
Mesolectic |
link |
| Asteraceae |
Geraea |
- |
Mesolectic |
link |
| Asteraceae |
Hymenopappus |
- |
Mesolectic |
link |
| Asteraceae |
Hymenopappus |
filifolius |
- |
link |
| Asteraceae |
- |
- |
- |
link |
| Onagraceae |
Oenothera |
- |
- |
link |
Assessment
Least Concern
Date: 1/2/2024
Justification:
Andrena utahensis is a dietary specialist solitary bee that occurs in the southwest United States. Using all observations of the species, the extent of occurrence is 256,961 km2. There have been no observations of this species since 2007. Lack of limited recent records is likely an effect of insufficient recent search effort. The species occurs in shrublands and forests of the Colorado and Arizona/New Mexico plateaus, and visits plants from the family Asteraceae for pollen. Across the range of the species, impacts from drought, climate change, and urbanization have been observed, and may be acting on the species at local levels. More information is needed about the impact of these threats and the population status of these species. Because the species is widespread, occurs in several habitat types, and its host plants are likely common and abundant, it is unlikely that it is threatened with extinction at this time. As such, it is assessed as Least Concern for now.
Distribution
Country Occurrence:
United States:
ArizonaColoradoNevadaNew MexicoUtah
EOO:256961.00 km²
AOO:Unknown
Map Notes:The map was created by generating a polygon using all known records of the species and then generalizing it.
Population
Trend:Unknown
Generation Length:1.00 years
Habitats and Ecology
Andrena utahensis is a dietary specialist that visits plants from the family Asteraceae, mostly the tribes Astereae and Heliantheae, for pollen (Larkin et al., 2008). This species has been recorded from deserts, shrublands, evergreen forests, and urban areas in Colorado and Arizona/New Mexico plateaus. This species likely nests underground like all other Andrena (Danforth et al., 2019), but nests from this species have not been described. Nest cells from other members of this genus are located at the ends of the lateral burrows, which are typically lined with a waxy Dufour’s gland secretion (Cane, 1981) that serves to both isolate the provision from pathogens in the surrounding soil and to regulate water uptake from the soil atmosphere (Cane & Love, 2021). Females provision each cell with a ball of pollen moistened with nectar on which they lay a single egg (Michener, 2007). Records of this species come from April through June (Chesshire et al., 2023). Adults are assumed to emerge annually (Danforth et al., 2019).
Habitat Types
- 1 Forest and Woodland
- 1.4 Temperate Forest
- 3 Shrubland -> Shrubland - Temperate
- 3.4 Shrubland –Temperate
- 8 Desert
- 8.3 Desert – Cold
- 14 Artificial - Terrestrial
- 14.5 Urban Areas
Use and Trade
This species is not known to be utilized commercially.
Threats
Since 2000, the Southwest U.S. has seen the worst drought in 1200 years (A. P. Williams et al., 2022). Drought can reduce the abundance of flowering plants on a landscape scale, and also reduce pollen and nectar quality (Wilson Rankin et al., 2020). Drought conditions have been shown to reduce the diversity and abundance of native bees (Hung et al., 2021; Minckley et al., 2013).
Certain aspects of this species' biology may make it more vulnerable to some threats. Andrena utahensis is a ground nesting species, and nests may be harmed by certain agricultural practices such as tilling, which can kill bees nesting close to the surface (N. M. Williams et al., 2010). This species is a dietary specialist, which has been linked to higher risk of extinction due to reduced host plant availability, especially under climate change scenarios (Roberts et al., 2011) and reduced effective population sizes (Packer et al., 2005). Additionally, Andrena have been reported to have low reproductive output because of the short adult life span, and a low rate of brood cell provisioning (reviewed in Danforth et al., 2019). Other threats to bees generally include habitat loss or modification, climate change, pesticide use, exposure to pathogens from managed bee species, and competition with honey bees (Brown & Paxton, 2009; Grab et al., 2019; Potts et al., 2010; Raven & Wagner, 2021; Wojcik et al., 2018).
| Code |
Threat |
Timing |
Scope |
Severity |
| 1 |
Residential & commercial development - 1.2. Commercial & industrial areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 1.1 |
Residential & commercial development - Housing & urban areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 1.2 |
Residential & commercial development - Commercial & industrial areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 2 |
Agriculture and aquaculture - Livestock farming and ranching -> Agro-industry grazing, ranching, or farming |
- |
- |
- |
| 2.1.3 |
Agriculture & aquaculture - Agro-industry farming |
- |
- |
- |
| 7 |
Natural system modifications - 7.1. Fire & fire suppression -> 7.1.2. Suppression in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 7.1.1 |
Natural system modifications - Increase in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 7.1.2 |
Natural system modifications - Suppression in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 8 |
Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - 8.1 Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species |
- |
- |
- |
| 8.1.2 |
Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - Named species |
- |
- |
- |
| 9 |
Pollution - 9.3 Agricultural and forestry effluents -> 9.3.3 Herbicides and Pesticides |
- |
- |
- |
| 9.3.3 |
Pollution - Herbicides and Pesticides |
- |
- |
- |
| 11 |
Climate change & severe weather - 11.3.Temperature extremes |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.1 |
Climate change & severe weather - Habitat shifting & alteration |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.2 |
Climate change & severe weather - Droughts |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.3 |
Climate change & severe weather - Temperature extremes |
- |
- |
- |
Conservation Actions
Conservation needs
No known conservation actions are in place for this species. Observations of this species are known from Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Forest Service, and National Park land, but this does not confer any specific protections to the species. Further research is needed to determine the overall size of the population and to identify trends and better understand existing threats.
Specific conservation needs for this species have not been identified. Due to the importance of supporting wild bee populations for pollination services, general conservation practices are recommended including, restoring, creating, and preserving natural high-quality habitats to include suitable forage and nesting sites; limiting pesticide use on or near suitable habitat, particularly during the adult bee’s flight period; promoting farming and urban practices that increase pollinator-friendly plants in margin space; minimizing exposure of wild bees to diseases transferred from managed bees; and lastly, avoiding honey bee introduction to high-quality native bee habitat.
Actions Needed
- 1.2 Resource & habitat protection
- 2.3 Habitat & natural process restoration
- 4.3 Awareness & communications
Research Needs
Surveys targeting this species are needed throughout its range to determine its persistence throughout its historic range. More information is needed about the population status, range limits, habitat, and ecology of this species.
Taxonomic Notes
(a. any taxonomic concerns about the validity of the species? b. any taxonomic revisions underway that would require a species reassessment.