← Back to Species List
Andrena cristata
Common Name: This will be blank if no common names exist.
Authority: Viereck
Assessment
Least Concern
Date: 5/29/2023
Distribution
Country Occurrence:
United States:
ArizonaCaliforniaNevadaOregonUtah
EOO:974628.00 km²
AOO:Unknown
Elevation:37 - 3215 m
Map Notes:The map was generated by drawing a polygon around all verified records and generalizing it.
Population
Trend:Unknown
Generation Length:1.00 years
Habitats and Ecology
There is little information about the habitat and ecology of Andrena cristata. The species is a pollen specialist bee that primarily uses pollen from the plant genus Arctostaphylos (Ericaceae). Records come from arid shrublands and woodlands, foothills, montane and subalpine forests. This species likely nests underground like all other Andrena (Danforth et al. 2019), but nests from this species have not been described. Nest cells from other members of this genus are located at the ends of the lateral burrows, which are typically lined with a waxy Dufour’s gland secretion (Cane 1981) that serves to both isolate the provision from pathogens in the surrounding soil and to regulate water uptake from the soil atmosphere ((Cane and Love 2021). Females provision each cell with a ball of pollen moistened with nectar on which they lay a single egg (Michener 2007).There are adult observations of this species from January to August, although most records come from March, April, and May. Adults are assumed to emerge annually.
Habitat Types
- 1 Forest
- 1.4 Forest – Temperate
- 3 Shrubland
- 3.4 Shrubland –Temperate
- 14 Artificial - Terrestrial
- 14.1 Arable Land
- 14.5 Urban Areas
Use and Trade
This species is not known to be utilized commercially.
Threats
Specific threats to this species have not been identified. Since 2000, the Southwest U.S. has seen the worst drought in 1,200 years (A. P. Williams, Cook, and Smerdon 2022). Drought can reduce the abundance of flowering plants on a landscape scale, and also reduce pollen and nectar quality (Wilson Rankin, Barney, and Lozano 2020). Drought conditions have been shown to reduce the diversity and abundance of native bees (Hung et al. 2021).
Certain aspects of this species' biology may make it more vulnerable to some threats. Andrena cristata is a ground nesting species, and nests may be harmed by certain agricultural practices such as tilling, which can kill bees nesting close to the surface (N. M. Williams et al. 2010). This species is oligolectic, which has been linked to higher risk of extinction due to reduced host plant availability, especially under climate change scenarios (Roberts et al. 2011) and reduced effective population sizes (Packer et al. 2005). Additionally, Andrena have been reported to have low reproductive output because of the short adult life span, and a low rate of brood cell provisioning (reviewed in (Danforth et al. 2019). Other threats to bees generally include habitat loss or modification, climate change, pesticide use, exposure to pathogens from managed bee species, and competition with honey bees (Brown and Paxton 2009; Potts et al. 2010; Wojcik et al. 2018; Grab et al. 2019; Raven and Wagner 2021).
| Code |
Threat |
Timing |
Scope |
Severity |
| 1 |
Residential & commercial development - 1.2. Commercial & industrial areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 1.1 |
Residential & commercial development - Housing & urban areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 1.2 |
Residential & commercial development - Commercial & industrial areas |
- |
- |
- |
| 2 |
Agriculture and aquaculture - Livestock farming and ranching -> Agro-industry grazing, ranching, or farming |
- |
- |
- |
| 2.1.3 |
Agriculture & aquaculture - Agro-industry farming |
- |
- |
- |
| 7 |
Natural system modifications - 7.1. Fire & fire suppression -> 7.1.2. Suppression in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 7.1.1 |
Natural system modifications - Increase in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 7.1.2 |
Natural system modifications - Suppression in fire frequency/intensity |
- |
- |
- |
| 8 |
Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - 8.1 Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases -> 8.1.2. Named species |
- |
- |
- |
| 8.1.2 |
Invasive and other problematic species, genes, and diseases - Named species |
- |
- |
- |
| 9 |
Pollution - 9.3 Agricultural and forestry effluents -> 9.3.3 Herbicides and Pesticides |
- |
- |
- |
| 9.3.3 |
Pollution - Herbicides and Pesticides |
- |
- |
- |
| 11 |
Climate change & severe weather - 11.3.Temperature extremes |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.1 |
Climate change & severe weather - Habitat shifting & alteration |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.2 |
Climate change & severe weather - Droughts |
- |
- |
- |
| 11.3 |
Climate change & severe weather - Temperature extremes |
- |
- |
- |
Conservation Actions
No known conservation actions are in place for this species. Observations of this species are known from Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Forest Service, and National Park Service (NPS) land, but this does not confer any specific protections to the species. Further research is needed to determine the overall size of the population and to identify trends and better understand existing threats.
Specific conservation needs for this species have not been identified. Due to the importance of supporting wild bee populations for pollination services, general conservation practices are recommended including, restoring, creating, and preserving natural high-quality habitats to include suitable forage and nesting sites; limiting pesticide use on or near suitable habitat, particularly during the adult bee’s flight period; promoting farming and urban practices that increase pollinator-friendly plants in margin space; minimizing exposure of wild bees to diseases transferred from managed bees; and lastly, avoiding honey bee introduction to high-quality native bee habitat.
Actions Needed
- 1.2 Resource & habitat protection
- 2.3 Habitat & natural process restoration
- 4.3 Awareness & communications
Research Needs
Surveys targeting this species are needed throughout its range to determine its persistence throughout its historic range. More information is needed about the population status, range limits, habitat, and ecology of this species.
Taxonomic Notes
males of this species are difficult to distinguish from Andrena obscuripostica.